Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-05-07 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-05-07 Senate Journal Page 1681 HB 184 The Rules Committee considered CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 184(JUD) am "An Act relating to insurance; amending Rule 402, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date." Signing to calendar: Senator Pearce, Chair, Senators Cowdery, Phillips, Therriault. Signing under other recommendations: Senator Ellis. The bill is on today's calendar. HB 184 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 184(JUD) am "An Act relating to insurance; amending Rule 402, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date" was read the second time. 2001-05-07 Senate Journal Page 1682 Senator Taylor, Chair, moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Judiciary Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 1618. Without objection, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 184(JUD) was adopted and read the second time. Senator Leman moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 184(JUD) was read the third time. Senator Green moved and asked unanimous consent to be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objections were heard, and Senator Green was required to vote. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 184(JUD) "An Act relating to insurance; amending Rule 402, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 184(JUD) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Dates/Court Rules YEAS: 16 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Cowdery, Davis, Donley, Elton, Hoffman, Leman, Lincoln, Olson, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Therriault, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Ellis, Green, Halford, Kelly Halford changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 184(JUD) passed the Senate. Senator Leman moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clauses. Without objection, it was so ordered. 2001-05-07 Senate Journal Page 1683 Senator Leman moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the court rule changes. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.